Blog

Short blog posts, journal entries, and random thoughts. Topics include a mix of personal and the world at large.

Cover your butt

Speaking of high auto insurance costs: part of the reason why it costs so much per month to insure my BMW M2 (aside from the fact it’s a fast BMW) is that I have way higher liability coverage limits than what is mandated by California. This great State of ours calls for only $15,000 for injury/death to one person, $30,000 for injury/death to more than one person, and $5,000 for damage to property (15/30/5 in insurance parlance). Those minimums are laughably low when considering the average selling price of new cars in America is about $48,000.

That means if you collide with a brand-new Toyota RAV-4, and you only have the California minimum coverage, high chance you will be personally on the hook for damages over those minimums. A total-loss for the RAV-4 is already above $30,000, so let’s not even add on any potential bodily injury of the opposing driver.

And yet the minimums aren’t any higher, because that means everybody’s base premiums would be higher as well. It seems California is incentivized to keep the minimums low, because more people would be able to afford auto insurance on the low end. (But driving is a privilege, not a right?) No need for low-income folks to carry high liability when there is nothing in their bank accounts for the opposing party to sue for.

Obviously, if you’re at least a medium earner with a some assets in reserves, you’d be risking a lot to not have higher coverage. I personally have 100/300/100 on the M2’s policy. On the other hand, I also carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Because a driver carrying State minimums can’t possibly cover a total loss of the M2. It’s kind of perverse, actually: if you have assets, you have to pay more to cover yourself and cover for other drivers’ insufficient coverage. Fair, it is not.

But I gladly pay my high insurance premiums. My risk tolerance is super low when it comes to preserving the integrity of my bank accounts. The car can always be replaced with a check from my insurance; never ever dependent on the other party’s insurance to make me whole.

Art for art's sake

Amazon’s The Grand Tour - a car show featuring the intrepid trio of Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond, and James May - released its latest episode a few weeks back. Named Sand Job, the premise is same as ever: take three used cars and drive them over a very long distance. Insert some manufactured shenanigans along the way. It’s been the same recipe since the trio was with BBC’s Top Gear, and yet we still watch every time a new episodes drops.

I tune in because the cinematography remains as beautiful as ever. The Grand Tour’s production value is immense. It’s turned into a sort of Planet Earth documentary, but with cars. Each episode is a showcase of an exotic locale that I would likely never step foot upon. Sand Job takes viewers to the Islamic Republic of Mauritania. A country that I have to admit I cannot pin on a map of Africa before watching. The drone shots of the Sahara desert is spectacular. And not once can you see the drone’s (or helicopter?) casted shadow. The attention to detail is to the maximum.

The car shenanigans is almost secondary to the motion-picture technicality, at least for me. There’s the usual explosions, cars breaking down, a drag race, and pranking James May. It’s all been done before, and I hope the trio continues to do so for at least a few more years. (Looks like this is the second to last episode in the series. Kind of sad!) They are getting up there in age, and none of them seem to care much in the taking care of their body department. What’s with guys getting to middle age and growing a large pot belly? (They are otherwise skinny without it.) A prolonged lack of a clean diet and exercising, surely.

In a world of Youtube car content - of which there is plenty - is there still room for The Grand Tour? I hope so, simply on the count of its splendid cinematography. Art for art’s sake! Let’s see if Amazon is willing to continue subsidizing such a series. Especially after it has reportedly lost a ton of millions on The Lord of the Rings…

Endless inflation

And the inflation hits keep on coming. Yesterday I was surprised with a double-whammy: renewal notices on this very domain (hosted by GoDaddy), and my auto insurance (underwritten by Progressive). Both are going up, much to my immense chagrin. Honestly, what remains in our daily lives that has not increased in pricing?

I would classify GoDaddy’s price bump as greed. How much work is there to maintain domain registration? My website is not even hosted with GoDaddy! I am failing to understand where the extra money is going towards. Maybe this site has increased in traffic enough to warrant a price increase? (A lot more pings!) That’s just my ego talking, obviously.

What isn’t greed is my auto insurance premiums going up. I have first-hand experience with how expensive it is to fix cars these days. My father’s Toyota Corolla got into a low-speed fender bender, and the whole ordeal was over $10,000. That’s about half the cost of the car new. It’s all the tech stuff in modern cars that’s driving up the costs. The Corolla has a front radar sensor, which in addition to replacing, the body shop had to drive the car to the local Toyota dealership to get it re-calibrated. Money.

So I don’t blame Progressive for raising my rates. The only slight ickiness about it is that it will probably never go back down. Cars certainly are not getting less complicated! Paying $200 a month (almost maximum coverage with high deductibles) for a car I seldom drive is the price to pay for being a car enthusiasts. My brother has a Lotus Evora - a six-figure sports car - on order. He’s going to be absolutely raked over when it comes to insuring that thing properly.

As saying goes: got to pay to play.

Get your hot dogs here

With all this complaining from me about food price inflation, the one constant I forgot about is the price of a hot dog at Costco. It seems come hell or high water, $1.50 will forever still buy you a hot dog and a soda there. A slice of pizza remains $1.99 as well. There is no freaking way McDonald’s and its $12 for a meal can compete with that.

It’s reputed that the Costco food court is a loss-leader. A marketing spend, an enticement for people to join its membership. That’s why the prices there have not kept up with inflation. That being said, Costco must be hemorrhaging cash at that side of operations now more than ever. Corporate greed aside, it’s indeed true that material costs have increase dramatically in recent years. Even Costco and its buying power can’t be immune to that.

The fact that even under these circumstances, the price of a Costco hot dog remaining the same is a testament to its corporate culture. It’s one of the few brands you can be morally satisified to do business with. (Another is Patagonia.)

But even Costco can only take on so much red ink. Word on the street is that soon, Costco will bar non-members from patronizing its food courts. Previously, anybody off the streets was allowed to buy a whole pizza for the low sum of $9.99. Not anymore! Inflation is so bad that Costco is restricting its de-facto food court subsidy to members only. There’s got to be a return on that subsidy.

The legion of blue-collar workers going to Costco for a cheap lunch will be so disappointed.

Free Tax USA

And my 2023 taxes are done! Because I’m a simpleton with only a W2 and a 1099-INT (from a savings account), filing taxes is always an under 30 minutes procedure. I’m obviously not a target customer for H&R Block. I can appreciate paying for convenience - in having a guy or gal do your taxes - but 30 minutes out of a weekend is not so detrimental.

What is detrimental is last year’s interest income. Because of historically high interest rates, the return from my savings account in 2023 was very healthy. That means I have to pay capital gains tax on that return, of which I am happy to do so, of course. It’s truly a first world problem if you’re complaining about having to pay a lot in capital gains tax. Though I do feel kind of icky about having to pay taxes on income derived from money I already paid taxes on.

The problem with having high interest income is that I no longer qualify for free filing with TurboTax. Apparently: interest income over $1,500 requires a schedule B form (which if you’re using a tax-filing software you shouldn’t have to care what that entails). Because of this one single extra form, TurboTax automatically asked me to upgrade to the paid Deluxe version. I went from free-filing for both Federal and State, to needing to pay over $110. Absolute vultures.

I’m not paying that in this economy. My friends turned me on to FreeTaxUSA, an online tax-filing service of the same ilk as TurboTax. The main difference here is that FreeTaxUSA doesn’t give its customers the bone. Federal tax filing is always free under (I am assuming) most circumstances, and it’s only $14 to file State taxes (compared to $59 for TurboTax). This is what friends are for: saving you $100.

Somewhat tangentially: I am honestly sick of seeing corporations raising prices because of “inflation” and “war in Ukraine”, then three months down the line say they’ve got a record profitable quarter. I endeavor to do as little business with such businesses as possible.

Ads all the way down

Ever notice there’s advertisement in absolutely everything? Even things that formerly did not have any ads. Amazon Prime video is now showing ads in its video content. To get the ad-free experience as before, you have to pay extra per month. It’s just like watching cable TV: many ad breaks within a program. I thought the whole point of “cutting the cord” was the ability to watch an entire episode uninterrupted? How the tables have turned. The arc of progress is a circle.

All because of ads. The entire house of cards is built on ads. Google can’t afford to give away stuff like Gmail if adverts weren’t the majority of the billions in revenues. Your favorite sports league’s viability is entirely based on the ability to sell ads - either at the arena, or on TV broadcasts. The reason WNBA players don’t make as much as NBA players is because they can’t attract enough advertising dollars. (It’s definitely not sexism.) Our favorite online platforms - that we use for free - wouldn’t exist without ads. We’re not the customer, we’re the product.

Downstream from all these advertisements is consumer spending. That’s the other major leg on this house of cards. Ads induce people to buy things they didn’t even realize they needed. Imagine if people didn’t buy, that every adult in this country is fiscally responsible, and consumer credit card debt is not a giant sword of Damocles. This economy would crumble. Companies would spend less on ads. Netflix wouldn’t have big budgets for its TV series. Your favorite online publication might have to charge subscription fees.

Not that I am wishing for the economy to go to shits. I’ve just become more aware of how pervasive advertising is, how much it props up a lot of things we use and enjoy. It’s kind of icky feeling, honestly. In response to Amazon Prime now showing ads in its video platform, I will be way less inclined than I already am to watch anything on that platform.

The price is wrong

Honda has (finally?) launched a fully electric vehicle for the North American market: the Honda Prologue. As expected, the Prologue is a mid-size SUV thing - the most popular type of vehicle in the States - designed to haul people and stuff. The layman would not know that this all-electric Honda is co-developed with General Motors. Not quite a re-badge, but it’s definitely a GM car with Honda window dressing on top.

Not that in it of itself is a bad thing. What Toyota has done with the Supra - essentially a re-styled BMW Z4 roadster - seems to have worked (and continues to work) just fine. I see plenty of Supras on the road, driven by guys who look a bit too young to be able to afford a $60,000 sports car.

The main problem I see with the Honda Prologue is that it is too expensive. The poverty FWD trim level starts at $48,795. For the AWD trim with some bells and whistles that most people would want, you’re looking at well into the $50,000 mark. Worse: as of writing, the Honda Prologue does not quality for the Federal EV tax credit ($7,500). I would bet only the true die-hard Honda fans would buy one of these over a Tesla Model Y (low $40,000s after tax incentives). That, or Honda will have to heavily discount the Prologue.

The Model Y has another advantage: buyers don’t have to beg some asshole at a dealership to take their money.

To be competitive, I think the Honda Prologue needs to start the high $30,000s. Because that’s what a gas engine equivalent - the Honda Pilot - starts at. Honda can’t charge an EV premium for what is a mass-market product, because that would simply drive buyers towards Tesla. Ford found out about this with its electric Mach E SUV. The problem is that Honda - GM, really - cannot build the Prologue cheap enough to sell in the $30,000s. Meanwhile, Tesla can produce Model 3 sedans and sell profitably in the high $30,000s all day long. It’s a competitive advantage that’s evident in the sheer amount of Model 3s and Model Ys we see on the road.

The first legacy automaker to market with an all-electric mid-size SUV selling in the $30,000s will be the one to take a chunk out of Tesla.